Upon completion of this lesson, you will be able to:
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, also known as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, is a theory in linguistics that suggests the structure of a language influences the way its speakers perceive and think about the world. The hypothesis is named after its proponents, Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf. It posits that different languages shape the thoughts, perceptions, and experiences of their speakers in distinct ways.
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that the language a person speaks can influence the way they think and perceive the world. For example, if a person speaks a language that has many terms to describe different types of snow, they may perceive and distinguish between different types of snow better than someone who speaks a language that doesn’t have those specific terms. This is because the language a person speaks shapes their way of thinking about the world and the things they perceive, influencing their perceptions, thoughts, and actions.
Another example would be gender in which words are used in some languages. In some languages, words have masculine or feminine gender, and this can affect the way people think about things associated with those genders. For example, in some languages, the word “house” may have feminine gender, and this may influence the way people think about houses, more strongly associating them with the feminine gender. This can lead to subtle differences in how people think about the world around them.
However, it is important to remember that the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is a controversial topic, and there is no general consensus in the scientific community about its validity. Some linguists and psychologists believe that language can influence a person’s thoughts, while others argue that thoughts and language are independent of each other and do not have a direct causal relationship.
There are two main versions of the hypothesis:
The strong version is also known as linguistic determinism, claims that language determines thought and that speakers of different languages have entirely different cognitive processes.
The strong version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, known as linguistic determinism, is largely considered implausible by most contemporary linguists and cognitive scientists. This is because it posits that thought is entirely determined by language, and that people cannot think about concepts that are not encoded in their language. However, I can provide a hypothetical example to illustrate the idea of linguistic determinism:
Imagine a language that does not have any words or concepts related to time, such as past, present, future, hours, minutes, or days. According to the strong version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, speakers of this language would be unable to think about or comprehend the concept of time because it is not encoded in their language. This would mean that their entire cognitive experience would be fundamentally different from that of speakers of other languages that do have words for time.
It is important to note that this example is purely hypothetical and does not reflect real-world cases. Empirical evidence generally supports the weak version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, indicating that language can influence thought, but it does not completely determine it.
In the 2016 science fiction film “Arrival,” the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, particularly the strong version, is explored through the interaction between humans and an alien species called Heptapods. The Heptapods have a unique language, which influences their perception of time in a non-linear way.
In the movie, the protagonist, Dr. Louise Banks (played by Amy Adams), is a linguist tasked with deciphering the Heptapods’ language. Their written language, called Heptapod B, consists of circular symbols that represent entire sentences, rather than linear sequences of words. As Dr. Banks becomes more proficient in Heptapod B, she starts to experience time in a non-linear manner, just like the Heptapods.
The film takes the strong version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis to an extreme by suggesting that learning the Heptapod language fundamentally changes Dr. Banks’ cognition and perception of time, allowing her to access memories from her own future. This artistic interpretation is a powerful narrative device that underscores the potential influence of language on thought. However, it is important to remember that the strong version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis has limited empirical support, and the events depicted in the movie are highly speculative and fictional.
The weak version is also known as linguistic relativity, posits that language influences thought but doesn’t entirely determine it, meaning that speakers of different languages may have somewhat different cognitive processes.
An example of the weak version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis can be found in the way different languages categorize colors. Research has shown that languages have varying numbers of basic color terms, and these differences can influence how speakers of those languages perceive and discriminate colors.
For instance, Russian has two separate words for blue: “голубой” (goluboy) for light blue and “синий” (siniy) for dark blue. English, on the other hand, has a single basic term, “blue,” which covers the entire spectrum of blue shades. Studies have found that Russian speakers can more quickly and accurately distinguish between light and dark blue shades compared to English speakers, suggesting that the language’s distinction between the two colors influences their perception.
This example supports the weak version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis because it demonstrates that language can influence thought and perception, but it does not determine them entirely. English speakers can still perceive and recognize different shades of blue, even though their language does not have separate terms for light and dark blue.
Applying the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis to programming languages (like R, Python, Java, or Rackett) can be done by considering how the structure and design of the language influences the way programmers approach problem-solving, program structure, and algorithm design.
An example of how a programming language can influence the way a programmer thinks can be seen when comparing functional programming languages like Haskell with object-oriented programming languages like Java.
Functional programming languages like Haskell emphasize the use of pure functions, immutability, and the avoidance of side effects. When programming in Haskell, a programmer is encouraged to think in terms of composing functions, treating data as immutable, and using higher-order functions to create more complex logic. This mindset fosters a focus on mathematical abstractions, reasoning about code correctness, and optimizing for function composition and data flow.
On the other hand, object-oriented programming languages like Java encourage a programmer to think in terms of objects, classes, and encapsulation. A programmer using Java will often design solutions around objects that represent real-world entities, with each object having its own state and behavior defined by methods. This mindset leads to an emphasis on organizing code into hierarchies of classes, managing object interactions, and leveraging inheritance and polymorphism to create reusable and extensible code.
Both functional and object-oriented programming languages have their strengths and weaknesses, but the key point here is that the design and principles of each language influence the mental models and problem-solving approaches employed by programmers. By working with different programming paradigms, programmers can expand their cognitive toolset and adapt their thinking to best suit the problem at hand.
R is a programming language specifically designed for statistical computing and graphics, which means it has a unique set of functions and libraries tailored for data manipulation and analysis. Due to its domain-specific focus, R can shape the way programmers think about data and statistics.
For example, the way R handles data structures like data frames or its built-in functions for statistical tests and visualizations may encourage programmers to think about problems and solutions in a more data-centric and statistically-oriented manner. This is in contrast to more general-purpose programming languages, like Python or Java, where the approach to problem-solving might be more broad or not as focused on statistical analysis.
However, it’s important to note that the influence of programming languages on thought is not as strong as the potential influence of natural languages on cognition, as programming languages are tools designed for specific tasks and don’t encompass the entirety of human experience. While the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis can be applied to programming languages to some extent, its effect may be limited to the domain of problem-solving, programming practices, and the mental models employed by programmers within the context of that specific language.
Ontologies are structured representations of knowledge in a specific domain. An ontologies typically consist of concepts (or classes), relationships, and instances, organized in a hierarchical manner. While ontologies are usually created using formal languages like the Web Ontology Language (OWL) or the Resource Description Framework (RDF), the process of building an ontology is often influenced by the ontologist’s understanding of the domain and their cultural and linguistic background.
The language an ontologist speaks can influence the way they build an ontology in several ways:
Conceptualization: Language and culture can affect how people categorize and relate concepts. For instance, the distinction between certain objects or concepts in one language might not exist in another. These differences in conceptualization can lead to variations in the structure and organization of ontologies created by ontologists with different linguistic backgrounds.
Terminology: The choice of terms and labels for concepts and relationships in an ontology can be influenced by the language spoken by the ontologist. This can have an impact on the understandability and usability of the ontology, particularly for users who speak different languages.
Ambiguity and Nuance: Languages often have words with multiple meanings or nuances that can be challenging to capture in a formal ontology. An ontologist’s linguistic background might influence how they interpret and represent these ambiguities, potentially resulting in ontologies that reflect subtle differences in understanding.
While the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that language can influence thought and perception, it is important to note that the impact of language on ontology construction is not deterministic. Ontologists can be aware of these linguistic influences and work towards creating more universally applicable and culturally neutral ontologies by collaborating with experts from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds, and by using standardized vocabularies and formal languages designed for knowledge representation.
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, also known as linguistic relativity, posits that the structure of a language influences its users’ cognition and perception of the world. This theory, developed by Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf, suggests that speakers/programmers of different languages may experience and think about the world in distinct ways.
The hypothesis has two versions: the strong version, which claims language determines thought, and the weak version, which states that language merely influences thought without determining it entirely.
Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5(4), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.2307/409588
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). MIT Press.
Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge University Press.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
Note that these references cover various aspects of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, including foundational texts, reformulations, and empirical research. They provide a good starting point for understanding the development and implications of the hypothesis.
Portions of the text in this lesson where generated by ChatGPT-4.